Polyurethane VS Slurry (Mudjacking)

· Smaller hole (5/8” even 3/8”) compared to 1 ¼” or bigger.

· Able to drive over when job is finished. Not with slurry (MudJacking).

· While the slurry used in mudjacking may wash away or deteriorate over time, especially in harsh weather conditions, polyurethane foam remains intact and offers a long-lasting solution.

· Polyurethane is lightweight and takes fewer drill holes

· Polyurethane expands and pushes water out of damaged area.

· Polyurethane is being promoted by engineers and the railway as approved methods or raising and stabilizing the ground mudjacking is not.

· Polyurethane only weighs 2lbs to 4 lbs per cubic foot vs 100lbs a cubic foot with mudjacking, causing less damage to the environment.

· Polyurethane can be used for many uses that mudjacking cannot, including seawalls, underwater scenarios and more.